| In an effort to get a better understanding of the voting tendencies of our congressional delegation I compiled the DW-Nominate scores for all of Minnesota's politicians from the 111th congress. DW-Nominate is a scoring system for politicians, running from around (-1) to 1, with (-1) being very liberal and 1 being very conservative. There's a few ways to look at these numbers; first we'll just look at the raw DW-Nominate scores.
| Representative | DW-N Score | | ELLISON | -0.58 | | OBERSTAR | -0.54 | | MCCOLLUM | -0.44 | | Average Dem | -0.35 | | WALZ | -0.28 | | PETERSON | -0.18 | | PAULSEN | 0.54 | | Average GOP | 0.63 | | KLINE | 0.69 | | BACHMANN | 0.71 |
|
This is probably not too shocking of a chart, for the most part reflecting the conventional wisdom about the liberal/conservative spread of our state's delegation, except for maybe Jim Oberstar who ranks as more liberal then I would have suspected. Now let's adjust those scores to the party average, so for instance, the Democrats average DW-Nominate score was -.35, so Keith Ellison would then score a -.23 and Colin Peterson would score a .17, meaning Ellison is more liberal than the average Democrat and Peterson is more conservative.
| Representative | DW vs average | | ELLISON | -0.23 | | OBERSTAR | -0.19 | | MCCOLLUM | -0.09 | | WALZ | 0.07 | | PETERSON | 0.17 | | PAULSEN | -0.09 | | KLINE | 0.05 | | BACHMANN | 0.08 |
Again, nothing to ground breaking; Paulson is more liberal than the average GOPer, Walz and Peterson are more conservative than the average Democrat. The next thing I want to do is take a look at the PVI, partisan voting index, for the districts. PVI measures how Republican or Democratic a district is by averaging the districts results of the past two presidential elections and comparing them to the overall results. The difference between the two numbers is the districts PVI score, which for the purposes of this exercise we'll format the same way as the DW nominate scores, positive for GOP leaning districts, negative for Democratic leaning districts.
| Representative | PVI | PVI vs Average | | ELLISON | -23 | -14 | | OBERSTAR | -3 | 6 | | MCCOLLUM | -13 | -4 | | WALZ | 1 | 10 | | PETERSON | 5 | 14 | | Average Dem | -9 | | | PAULSEN | 0 | -11 | | KLINE | 4 | -7 | | BACHMANN | 7 | -4 | | Average GOP | 11 | |
Tim Walz and Eric Paulson reside in the two swing districts in the state, according to PVI, with Oberstar's 8th and Kline's 2nd on the verge of being swingy. Obviously Colin Peterson's 7th is in a bit of a special category, being solidly Republican yet sending Peterson back to congress year after year.
Now we can take these two measures and combine them into one number that will tell us how partisan a member is for their district on a rough -1 to 1 scale. We'll call this number the Selectively Integrated Legislator Variance Evaluation Resource, or SILVER for short.
| Representative | SILVER | | ELLISON | -0.03 | | OBERSTAR | -0.55 | | MCCOLLUM | -0.04 | | WALZ | -0.15 | | PETERSON | -0.06 | | PAULSEN | 0.14 | | KLINE | 0.31 | | BACHMANN | 0.26 |
What stands out to me on this chart is when put into the context of their districts Oberstar is quite a bit more liberal than his colleagues; in fact he's 7th among all Democrats in SILVER. My representative, Keith Ellison, whom the conventional wisdom has as an uber-liberal, is right around average. I also think this is vindication of a sort for Colin Peterson who has taken a lot of flak for some of his recent votes but is, by this measure, more liberal then Keith Ellison or Betty McCollum. |
