(Yesterday, Laura Brod (R=Hypocrite) announced she wasn't running for re-election this fall; today, I thought it would be a good idea to "highlight" some of her escapades...so, here's a reprint and make sure to link and read Spot - promoted by TwoPuttTommy)
It was just one year ago, June 2008, when GOPer Laura Brod was a nominee for that month's "Hypocrite Of The Month". It's important to remember why Brod was singled out that month: she stood in front of a microphone, as a surrogate for ol' Smokescreen, even though ol' Smokescreen had done his best to cover for his pals Jack Abramoff, Tom DeLay, et al. And Laura earned that nomination; click here for a recap of her hypocrisy and the sordid treatment of women that Norm Coleman ignored as Chair of the Truman Committee.
Yet there Laura Brod was, a year ago, rippin' Al Franken. Nothing demonstrates hypocrisy more than an indignant republiCon woman defending a guy like Norm Coleman's inactions by criticizing someone else's jokes.
And no one epitomizes a republiCon makin' (stuff) up more than Laura Brod and her imaginary issue of "voter fraud." Take, for instance, part of what Spot at The Cucking Stool wrote, in a piece entitled "A solution in search of a problem" back in February 2007:
In her little incitement to action, Rep. Brod mentions the increase in "identity theft and fraud." What she doesn't do, because she can't, is tie the efforts of digital thieves to voter fraud. And frankly, you'd have to be a pretty stupid thief to try to steal a vote here and there. Now that he thinks about it, Spot has never gotten a Nigerian voter-fraud scheme email!
How many voter fraud cases in Minnesota have you read about in the paper recently, boys and girls? Spot certainly hasn't seen any. If Rep. Brod's proposals ever gets a committee hearing, Spot hopes that Rep. Brod and her sidekicks will get a good grilling on the evidence behind statements like those contained in her letter.
Rep. Brod says that she just wants to be sure that "only those who are legally eligible can participate." Bull chips. What she really wants is to depress the turnout of the poor, the minorities, and the natives. (The Cucking Stool)
PhoenixWoman at Mercury Rising noted "right" around the same time:
|
Ever since they stopped being the Party of Lincoln and adopted the explicitly racist "Southern Strategy" in the 1960s, Republicans - nationally and locally, elected and in the media, traditional and online - have been attacking any and all efforts to enable more people, especially poor people and non-white people, to vote. Instead, they push various measures, under the pretext of "fighing voter fraud", that put barriers between poor and non-white would-be voters and the voting booth because they know that these groups of people vote overwhelmingly for Democrats.
In the case of Minnesota, my home state, Republican legislators like Laura Brod (R-New Prague- she signed the letter the State Republican caucus is circulating to outstate Minnesota newspapers such as the St. Cloud Times) and their blogging buddies are savaging newly-minted Democratic State Attorney General Mark Ritchie for his eminently sensible proposal to automatically register anyone with a valid Minnesota driver's license. Since getting a driver's license - or even renewing one - is a complicated process with plenty of verification checks at each step, it makes sense that anyone who has achieved a license is almost certainly a legal resident.
Republicans like to pooh-pooh any suggestions that their legislation is intended to suppress voter turnout among minorities and the poor. But everyone knows better, and there's yet another study showing that GOP-promoted measures concerning voter identification lead directly to depressed turnout among those populations. (Mercury Rising)
So, basically, with respect to Laura Brod, what we have is a hypocrite that doesn't mind makin' (stuff) up. In other words, the GreedOverPrinciples party, personified.
I watched the Oral Arguments in the recount case yesterday on the Uptake; I watched what was either the last or the latest whipping a Team Smokescreen attorney endured from Judge(s). And at the very end, I watched this:
"There is no evidence of fraud in this election. And maybe it's the law out there; maybe it's the character of the people in Minnesota. We don't have any fraud."
Joe Friedberg, arguing before the Minnesota Supreme Court, 01 June 2009
That quote began at the 1:06:10 mark. It bears repeating:
"There is no evidence of fraud in this election. "
And I, too, noted Christian Sande ask just a few minutes later: "Laura Brod, are you listening?"
Well, just in case Laura Brod wasn't listening and/or keeps makin' (stuff) up with regards to voter fraud, I thought it might be a good idea to have a way to remind her.
So, earlier today, I registered the domain name www.LauraBrodAreYouListening.com
Somehow, someway, I'm thinking that domain name will become a full-fledged website.
Stay tuned! |
