Quick Links:

Congressman Walz whistling a sweet sound to my Earmarks

by: JacobGrippen

Thu Apr 09, 2009 at 12:27:32 PM CDT


(Context = good. - promoted by Joe Bodell)

One person's earmark is another person's good idea.

Earmarks get a bad rep.  They can be very useful.  And I believe part of the problem is how we talk about them.

Who can forget Senator McCain's Top 10 Lists of "Pork barrel" projects via Twitter?  Randomly posting pieces of information with no other facts makes for good entertainment, but it doesn't help us to understand perhaps why these earmarks exist.  Referring to all appropriations spending as pork does a discredit to sometimes very sound projects.  How to we remedy this?  Congressman Walz seems to have a pretty good grasp on what to do.

JacobGrippen :: Congressman Walz whistling a sweet sound to my Earmarks
http://walz.house.gov/apps/lis...

For Immediate Release
April 6, 2009

Contact: Meredith Salsbery
507-388-2149

WASHINGTON D.C. - Continuing his fight to improve transparency and accountability in Washington, Congressman Tim Walz today unveiled an updated earmark process that reaches new levels of public transparency, emphasizing investments that create jobs and long lasting public benefits. Walz also announced the First District needs for economic recovery he forwarded to the House Appropriations Committee.    

"Local leaders from communities across southern Minnesota requested funding for an unprecedented number of projects to improve our quality of life in southern Minnesota and create jobs in this challenging economy," said Walz.  "I'm confident based on a thorough review of the applications that the projects I am requesting will produce a return on the investment made by the taxpayers of southern Minnesota."

It is the constitutionally-mandated role of Members of Congress to appropriate federal funding.  These funding requests do not add extra spending to the federal budget. Instead, they set aside for a specific project funds that would otherwise be spent by a federal agency.  

The reformed earmark process, which was championed and led by Walz, now requires Members to post all earmark requests and requested dollar amounts on their website, as well as the potential recipient, information about the necessity of the project, and contact information for requestors. A fact sheet is attached detailing Walz's leadership on earmark reform.

"Local leaders who are closest to understanding our deeply unmet needs in southern Minnesota brought these projects to our attention," said Walz.  "I am pleased to stand up for veterans, farmers, the National Guard, educators, cancer research, Highway 14 and other critical public investment projects."    

"While it is likely that only a few of these meritorious projects will ultimately receive funding, I believe it is important for residents of southern Minnesota to be able to see the list of projects I am supporting and I am proud to release this information about priorities."  

All projects were reviewed for meeting at least one of the key criteria set by Walz:

Transformative: has the potential to make a significant improvement in the economy of a community or drastically improve safety for residents.
Cost-Effective: uses limited funds efficiently and effectively in a way that drives local economic development.
Job Creators: creates, saves or attracts jobs in Minnesota's 1st Congressional District.

The Five-Step Appropriations Process:

Step 1: Every year, Congressman Walz proactively invites applications from localities and nonprofits that wish to request appropriations.  Walz does not accept applications from for-profit entities.

Step 2: Based on a combination of written applications, phone conversations, and project tours, Walz reviewed projects based on being transformative, cost-effective and job creators.

Step 3: Upon submission to the House Appropriations Committee, Congressman Walz has publicly posted his FY2010 requests, which are also attached to this release.

Step 4: Also at the time the request is made, the Congressman sent the committee a letter certifying that he will not benefit financially from any earmarks.

Step 5: When the appropriations bill comes up for a vote, it will be accompanied by a list identifying each earmark in it and which member requested it. These tables will be made publicly available ahead of the vote and Walz will release to the press a list of projects that ultimately receive funding and the amounts they receive.


Here's the link to the Congressman's 2010 Fiscal Year Appropriations Requests (pdf)

http://walz.house.gov/pdf/FY20...

I spy information for the public!
(Which is something that Congress is supposed to do on their websites)

We get the project name, project city, amount requested, and even the address of the requestee.

These projects really seem like the other white meat, don't they?

No?

Here's Congressman Walz's Record on Earmark Reform

THE WALZ RECORD ON EARMARK REFORM
April 2009

This is Congressman Tim Walz's third year requesting appropriations projects for Minnesota's 1st District and in each successive year, Walz has insisted on increased transparency and asked his colleagues to join him in publicly disclosing information.  

2007: Walz was the only member of the Minnesota delegation to release a complete list of his appropriations requests for FY2008.

Also in 2007, Walz successfully pushed to reform the previously secretive appropriations process in Congress.  Under new rules implemented by the Democratic Majority that year, any project funded in an appropriations bill was and continues to be publicly attributed to the Member who requested it.  Additionally, Members of Congress now must publicly certify that they do not have any financial interest in a project that they are requesting.

2008: Walz was the first member of the Minnesota delegation and one of only a handful of Representatives to include the dollar amount he requested in his public disclosure of FY2009 appropriations requests.  

2009: Walz set out criteria to ascertain the impact each project will have on southern Minnesota.  He is also making public additional details about projects public, including the requesting party, fiscal agent, and information supporting the necessity of the project.

Walz has posted his requests online every year of his tenure in Congress. He supports the added scrutiny this year which requires all Members of Congress to publish earmark requests and dollar amounts requested on their website at the time the requests are submitted to the House Appropriations Committee.

Congressman Walz goes above and beyond the current "added scrutiny" required of his fellow members of the House.

I call on all Members of the U.S. House to follow Congressman Walz's lead and post the information that will help educate the public.

Knowledge is power.  An empowered knowledgeable electorate is better able to make decisions about its representation.  Transparency forces "crooked" politicians to come out into the light about their so-called "pork" projects.  If we're educated as to why something deserves appropriation we are better able to judge appropriations bills not by talking points, but by factual, relevant, transparent information.

I thank Congressman Walz for his commitment to transparency and once again urge his colleagues to follow suit.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tweet This!
Walz is an Educator First (0.00 / 0)
IF Knowledge is Power, then Misinformation is Key to Re-election.
Case in point  - Earmarks.  
Visit John Kline's website ... conveniently called "Stop the Pork" and the voter is informed of examples of earmark spending.  
The first thought the voter may get is that Kline will stop these expenditures in the future.  Unfortunately, if you examined the approval of these authorizations, the voter would learn that most were passed with a majority of Republicans support.  The Republicans talk about the evils of "earmarks" yet they do not staff the Appropriations Committee with fiscal hawks like Jeff Flake (R-AZ) who has repeatedly been denied open seats.
"Earmarks" are not the problem ... in fact, they are necessary for Congress to control how the monies are spent.  Ron Paul (R-TX) recently described McCain's twitters as "grandstanding" and that all expenditures should be in earmark form.  Reading the Constitution Article 1 Section 9, Paul is correct as failure to define the project allows the Executive Branch to spend the monies as they deem appropriate.

In political-speak, Kline is misinforming the voters blaming earmarks instead of attacking wasteful government spending.  The big talk is Gates DOD budget and I am glad that he is taking a hard look at these programs.  I never heard Kline complain about comic books nor F22 aircraft.  The "earmarks" that Kline uses as campaign commercials are small in comparison to the military cost overruns such Army's Future Combat System (FCS) which even McCain's advisors question.

Besides transparency, the other improvement would be for the State to approve the earmark.  For example, MN-DOT should approve earmarks before Congress approves so that a Congressman doesn't dictate projects however that would also require some political courage that Governor Pawlenty refused to give the Minnesota delegation.

Walz has been a leader ... but then again his background is as an educator ... so he is not inclined to misinform the voters to get re-elected.


 

Event Calendar
March 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 * * *
<< (add event) >>


Liberal Blog Network
Agonist
All Spin Zone
AlterNet
AMERICAblog
American Street
ArchPundit
BAGNewsnotes
BartCop
Blogging of the Pres
BlogACTIVE
Bluegrass Report
Bluegrass Roots
Blue Indiana
BlueJersey
Blue Mass. Group
BlueOregon
BlueNC
Bob Geiger
Booman
Brendan Calling
BRAD Blog
Buckeye State Blog
Burnt Orange Report
Capitol Annex
Carpetbagger Report
Chris Floyd
Clay Cane
Calitics
Cliff Schecter
Confined Space
Corrente
Crooks and Liars
culture kitchen
Cursor
Daily Kos
David Corn
Dem Bloggers
Democrats.com
Deride and Conquer
Democratic Underground
Digby
DovBear
Drudge Retort
Ed Cone
ePluribus Media
Eschaton
Ezra Klein
Feministe
Feministing
Firedoglake
Fired Up
First Draft
Frameshop
Green Mountain Daily
Greg Palast
Hoffmania
Horse's Ass
Hughes for America
In Search of Utopia
Is That Legal?
Jesus' General
Jon Swift
Juan Cole
Keystone Politics
Kick! Making Politics Fun
KnoxViews
Lawyers, Guns & Money
Left Coaster
Left in the West
Liberal Avenger
Liberal Oasis
Loaded Orygun
Mahablog
Majikthise
Make Them Accountable
Matthew Yglesias
MaxSpeak
Media Girl
Michigan Liberal
MN Campaign Report
Minnesota Monitor
MyDD
My Left Nutmeg
My Left Wing
My Two Sense
Nathan Newman
Needlenose
Nevada Today
News Dissector
Newshoggers
News Hounds
Nitpicker
Oliver Willis
onegoodmove
OpenLeft
PageOneQ
Pam's House Blend
Pandagon
People's Rep. of Seabrook
PinkDome
Politics1
Political Animal
Political Wire
Poor Man Institute
Prairie State Blue
Progressive Historians
Raw Story
Reno Discontent
Republic of T
Rhode Island's Future
Rochester Turning
Rocky Mountain Report
Rod 2.0
Rude Pundit
Sadly, No!
Saterical Political Report
Seeing The Forest
Shakesville
SirotaBlog
SistersTalk
Skippy
Slacktivist
Smirking Chimp
SquareState
Suburban Guerrilla
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
Talk Left
Tapped
Taylor Marsh
Tattered Coat
Texas Kaos
The Albany Project
The Blue State
The Democratic Daily
The Hollywood Liberal
The Reaction
The Talent Show
This Modern World
Town Called Dobson
Wampum
War and Piece
WashBlog
Watching the Watchers
West Virginia Blue
Young Philly Politics
Young Turks




Premium Blog Ads

Hate ads? Make them go away -- Subscribe to MPP!

2010 DFL CONVENTION SUPERDELEGATE TRACKER

2010 DFL CONVENTION DELEGATE TRACKER





MN-PLAN Ads

Blog Ads




Powered by: SoapBlox