Quick Links:

Entenza: DFL needs to present positive vision for victory

by: Joe Bodell

Mon Mar 09, 2009 at 07:30:00 AM CDT


Former House Minority Leader Matt Entenza has a good idea of where his campaign needs to go and how to get there: with judicious use of internet technology.

"Statewide campaigns either get a political cold and die, or keep building, and by the end we're talking to 2.3 million people. By the end of the campaign almost every voter in the state will have some form of web contact with the campaign -- the campaigns that don't use the web early will die."

Entenza was the DFL-endorsed candidate for Attorney General in 2006, but walked away from the race after getting involved in a public political fight with gubernatorial nominee Mike Hatch. But he didn't walk away from politics altogether -- he started MN 2020, a progressive think tank that has experienced rapid growth and helped move the debate away from reactionary Republican messaging and toward progressive views of issues and governance. "When you're in political leadership, you spend very little time thinking about ideas -- you spend most of your time recruiting candidates, raising money, engaging in political dogfights with the other side that are 'of the moment' -- but you're still operating in the conservative message frame.

"In the last two years I've been able to step back and ask where the state should be going, and focus on the things that made this state great -- quality public education, infrastructure, a strong economic development system, and health care that's pretty good compared to other states. State politics over the last twenty years have been about abortion, gay marriage, stadiums, things other than those that made the state work -- that's conservative politics. We've been able to move the debate at MN2020."

Can Matt Entenza win? He's already put together a strong campaign team, has the necessary resources, and is reportedly "an animal" on the dialing-for-dollars circuit. He has experience both political and ideological, and is committed to employing all the technological tools at a modern campaign's disposal in order to win. I came away impressed at how easily he was able not just to link important issues, but put them in a progressive frame and clearly describe how to use that frame to win. Tim Pawlenty and his buddies in the Republican Party hate his guts -- if the past two election cycles are any indication, that should put Entenza is good company with the general electorate of Minnesota. He'll be a strong contender for the DFL nomination, and we'll all be watching very closely to see what happens in the seven weeks between that nomination and the general election.

More after the break

Joe Bodell :: Entenza: DFL needs to present positive vision for victory
With MN2020, Entenza has built an important piece of the progressive infrastructure in the state, and speaks easily about important, interconnected issues like mass transit and  economic development, green energy and health care. "For any Democrat to win this race, you need to have a positive, progressive vision of how to grow an economy ... Iowa does a tremendous job of getting companies to locate to their state, and the only thing Minnesota currently has is JOBZ -- tax cuts. JOBZ is one of a number of things that will be gone when I'm in office."  

"Conservative politics in this state are about shrinking the pie and forcing educators and social services and other state programs to fight against one another for funding, and everyone loses. To do all the things we want to do, we have to grow the pie, we have to grow the economy. There's a handful of states where clean, alternative energy is going to grow, and we have to be one of them."

Entenza mentioned that JOBZ would be gone if he's elected Governor, and I asked which other programs would be changed or dropped. He immediately brought up No Child Left Behind, the Bush administration's major education bill which has been widely panned by public school teachers and administrators for placing standards on school districts but not providing resources to reach those standards.

As I have with other candidates seeking the DFL nod, I asked how the campaign message now compares with what is necessary to win next November. Entenza's answer? "Barack Obama's campaign showed that the message on Day One needs to be the message in November. The people who argue that you start by appealing to your base and then pirouette to the center...that's the old way. It doesn't work. The DFL hasn't won the Governor's office since 1986 -- that's a pretty good sign that the old ways aren't working very well. I think it's largely because DFLers haven't produced a vision of where to take the state. Conservatives have -- it's a terrible vision, but they have a vision. And if the choice is between a candidate who has a vision and one who doesn't, people will choose the one who does."

Entenza has the resources to compete at whatever stage of the campaign he chooses -- along with former U.S. Senator Mark Dayton, he's one of the two candidates in the race who could theoretically afford to self-fund a competitive campaign. I asked him about the DFL endorsement and primary process, and how his campaign is treating them: "I prefer the endorsement process. But when you have several candidates who aren't abiding, it creates mischief in the convention process. Candidates who aren't supporting the process start trying to get the weakest candidate the endorsement. I want to be endorsed, and will put a lot of energy into the endorsement." He cited 1994, when Mike Hatch managed to throw the endorsement to John Marty, believing Marty to be a weaker candidate in a primary than Mike Freeman. Hatch ended up losing a close primary to Marty, who then proceeded to get slaughtered that November.

"In order to win, you have to know the whole state -- the first time you go to a small town can't be when you're running for Governor. I've spent the last 12 years as a legislative leader and with  MN2020, I've traveled on every road that's out there, I know the mayors, the little issues. People who wins elections are folks with a base in the whole state."

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tweet This!
I wrote this post late last night... (0.00 / 0)
...and set it to auto-post this morning, so let me know if you find any blatant typos.

No way (0.00 / 0)
"but walked away from the race after getting involved in a public political fight with gubernatorial nominee Mike Hatch."

Well, that's certainly one way of describing what happened.  

 


Can someone post a refresher about (0.00 / 0)
what exactly happened back in 2006 between Entenza and Hatch? I remember something about a private eye. I know it was considered a scandal, but I don't remember much else. And I know I'm not the only one.

People will say, "Well, Entenza burned his bridges," and when I ask for details, they never have 'em.

I'm not trying to start an argument. I honestly don't remember what went down.


[ Parent ]
Re: Refresher (0.00 / 0)
Lynnell, I appreciate the question and your desire to have the facts. I'm working for Matt (and incidentally was present during his interview with Joe yesterday). Joe and I are talking about a follow-up dealing with this issue, but I didn't want to leave you without a response at least from us.

Here is what happened: While running for Attorney General, Matt hired a research firm -- one that has done work for other DFLers in the past -- to gather public documents on his own record and related to things going on in the AG's office, such as major litigation in-progress. Candidates need to do all kinds of research in order to be successful -- including research on themselves to uncover inaccurate information that might be in the public domain and research about the office for which they are running. (Ironically, two years later, Al Franken was criticized for not doing ENOUGH research.)

Unfortunately, the firm went further than asked and sought public documents involving then-AG and gubernatorial candidate Mike Hatch personally. The firm publicly apologized, as did Matt. Nevertheless, the story was out there and generating a lot of talk, so in the interest of party unity, Matt voluntarily withdrew from the race. He believed staying in would have given the Republicans just another issue to use against the DFL: a conflict between two candidates on the ticket. Democrats ended up having a very successful year in 2006, with the exception of the governor's race. It was the right decision.

A lot has happened since then. When Matt's tenure in the legislature ended, he founded Minnesota 2020, where he's been focused squarely on the key issues facing our state: economic development, education, health care and transportation. The 2008 election brought much-needed change on the national level. We need change in Minnesota in 2010 as badly as our nation did in 2008. As a Democrat first (former State Central member, CD officer, SD officer), and a staffer second, I believe Matt is the person to help lead this change as governor.

As Matt and I have discussed with Joe, we intend to work very hard in this campaign -- for your support, for the DFL endorsement, for victory in 2010. Please know you can email me directly at bridget@entenza.com or Matt directly at matt@entenza.com with further questions or thoughts about the race.


[ Parent ]
Interesting (0.00 / 0)
Good to see you guys have gotten your story straight on that one.  I am curious as to the campaign's spin on the other main issue with Mr. Entenza's candidacy - his wife's work (and compensation) at United Health Care.

As you know, Lois Quam (Mr. Entenza's wife) was formerly an executive at United Health Care, a medical insurance company.  United Health Care was very profitable, and Ms. Quam received significant compensation.  I have heard that it was as much as $30 or $35 million dollars.

United Health Care has had a lot of legal trouble over the last several years.  First, it turns out that company directors, including its CEO Bill McGuire, were backdating stock options.  The SEC investigated and as part of a settlement hundred of millions of dollars had to be repaid.  It also turns out that at least part of the reason United Health Care was so profitable was because it was engaging in illegal billing practices.  The company has been investigated by attorneys general in nearly every state, and has paid millions of dollars in settlements and fines.  The company was being investigated by Minnesota's attorney general (Mike Hatch) at the time Mr. Entenza was running for attorney general in 2006.

I have the following questions:

1)  Did Ms. Quam have any involvment in the defrauding of company shareholders or the defrauding of patients?

2)  Is the $30 or $35 million dollar figure accurate?  If not, how much did Ms. Quam earn from United Health Care.  Because health care and health care reform is such an important issue, I think that its fair to ask that this information be disclosed.

3)  Is the money Ms. Quam earned from United Health Care going to be used to fund Mr. Entenza's campaign for governor?

4)  I don't think that its unfair to say that the conduct of United Health Care is reprehensible.  Have Mr. Entenza or Ms. Quam ever taken a position on the company's behavior?  Is there pending litigation that prevents Ms. Quam from doing so?

 


[ Parent ]
Entenza = Blago (0.00 / 1)
'nuff said.  

[ Parent ]
A health care system that's pretty good compared to other states? (0.00 / 0)
You gotta be kidding me on that one. We need  a lot better than pretty good on health care.
Matt is funded by his wife Lois Quam of United Health Group, the state's largest PRIVATE, FOR PROFIT, health insurer. (Remember the $2billion the CEO Bill McGuire grabbed there?) Lois came in with a$500,000 bonus or so, if memory serves. (I'm not sure how much, but Matt's wife did make, and continues to make, tons of money in the profit off of people's health insecurity business). This wories me about how much he would do in health care that is in the interest of the people, and how much he would do in the interest of private health insurers. Surely, from his "pretty good compared to" comment (notice he says "compared to", which leaves him room for something that is downright crappy, which could still be better than what is happening in other states.), it's a sure bet Matt isn't going to get behind single payer.
But if we have a Democratic majority in the House and state  Senate, and get a Democratic governor, there is no excuse for not passing a single payer plan for Minnesota. That would be pretty good compared to European countries. Even if you don't go to a single payer plan, with Democratic majorities in the House and Senate, there is no excuse for a Democrat running for governor to not be pushing for a strong, high quality health care system of some sort.

Just to be accurate... (4.00 / 1)
Lois Quam left UHG a while ago.  3yrs, 5yrs ... something like that.

[ Parent ]
Also in the interest of accuracy (4.00 / 1)
Entenza was talking about the things that have made (read: past tense) Minnesota great when he mentioned a health care system that's pretty good next to other states -- not a specific proposal for what to do in the future.

[ Parent ]
John Marty for a healthier MN (0.00 / 0)
I agree with you Roz, we need a candidate and a Governor in 2010 that will have the courage and the vision to push a single-payer health care package. Let's have the courage to focus on HEALTH CARE, not HEALTH INSURANCE. There is only one candidate that has that courage, vision and intelligence to be pusing for that now, that's Senator John Marty. As Author of the Minnesota Health Plan-Marty has proven to have the vision that Matt is talking about in this interview. Instead of talking the talk, John Marty has always walked the walk. Yes, John got beat in 1994. Then again, Matt ran for statewide seat in 2006 and didn't win. Does that make them both unelectable? Of course not, Obama lost his first bid for US Congress, and went on the be a Senator instead and now is our President. The State got it wrong in 1994, and we've suffered because of it since then. John and his vision was ahead of him time-but we can get it right this time. John Marty is the only truly progressive candidate. He doesn't have to try to buy the election, doesn't have to wait to see what others are doing before he makes his campaign strategy (look at that cowardly non-sense that Matt said in that interview. He'll wait to see what others do before he decides how to proceed. What does that mean? Is that the type of bold leadership we need? How about we support a candidate that will actually take a stand for something!)and he doesn't have to try to change his position to appeal to a base. He just stands up for what he belives in, and defends our shared values. He's been doing it for over 20 years. Rememeber, he was the only Senator who voted against the 99 and 2000 tax cuts-the same cuts that helped us get into the financial mess we are currently in! He's the real deal. He's been fighting for us, instead of trying to intimidate or buy people's support. Instead of making the same mistake we usually make and going for someone with money who SEEMS "electable", let's instead make the right candidate "electable" by supporting him early and loudly. Enough with these big money candidiates, let's elect somebody who stands up for us! John Marty has my support and will have my vote. www.johnmarty.org  

[ Parent ]
Okay then (0.00 / 0)

Proudtobeadem said ...(look at that cowardly non-sense that Matt said in that interview. He'll wait to see what others do before he decides how to proceed. What does that mean? Is that the type of bold leadership we need? How about we support a candidate that will actually take a stand for something!)

Hmm, yes, but what "candidates say" here could be just what is asked of them and then their answer.

Matt Entenza might do better to explain how he'll help the people. Not really super in depth but enough so we know he's listening and then going to act.

I agree with you on the health care issue, though.  I wish we'd amend the const so we can run on a deficit in conjunction with enacting universal health care at the state level.


[ Parent ]
I agree Holly (4.00 / 1)
Yes Holly, I agree. It's all semantics. However, the problem is that Matt himself said (in this story) that the message on day one should be the same message at the end of the campaign! Hmm... there already seems to be hypocrisy there. He's saying he'll have a clear message from the start, but he's also refusing to take a strong position on an important subject. So, does that mean we can always expet him to wait to see what's popular before he makes up his mind?  

[ Parent ]
Entenza's UnitedHealth warchest (0.00 / 0)
Matt and his wife took WAY more than $500,000 from United Health -- many, many millions in stock.  Now she's an investment banker at Piper Jaffray.  What's next, clubbing baby seals?

[ Parent ]
Fact check? (4.00 / 1)
Uh, roughrider, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure Lois is not an "investment banker" at Piper Jaffray.  According to the company's website, she was hired to help them explore opportunities in alternative energy/clean technology.

Also, I'm getting tired of seeing people who have worked hard and played by the rules get bashed just because they've been successful.  Universally casting aspersions on people who are well off is so clearly motivated by spitefulness and jealousy, and it's not at all conducive to having coherent discussions about issues that are actually important.


[ Parent ]
Fact check (0.00 / 0)
The problem here is that United Health Care did not play by the rules.  It engaged in massive fraud of both its shareholders and its customers.  Whether or not Ms. Quam had anything to do with the fraud, she profited handsomely from the company's fraudulent practices.  

[ Parent ]
Is there a democrat you'd like to see iin office, Dan? (0.00 / 0)

Dan, is there a democrat you'd like to see as governor?

[ Parent ]
Yes (0.00 / 0)
There are a number of Democrats I would like to see as governor.  I am not sure why that question follows my comment, though.  Its not a secret that United Health Care defrauded its shareholders and customers.  The profits it earned were made by wrongfully denying health coverage.  Its also not a secret that Quam earned millions of dollars for her work at that company.  



[ Parent ]
Name one (0.00 / 0)

Name one democrat you'd like as governor, Dan.  All I see is you ripping on Democrats, and so it would be nice to hear you say at least one positive thing.

[ Parent ]
OK (0.00 / 0)
Of those running, I would be happy with Thissen, Gaertner, Rybak, Coleman, Kelliher, Kelley and maybe Bakk.  

[ Parent ]
Now we're talking (0.00 / 0)

Hey, that's a good list.  I'm trying to decide who's best (leaning towards Kelliher still).  Why do you support those dems?  Can you give me specific issue information? Thanks  

[ Parent ]
I agree! (4.00 / 1)
Lois Quam was employed by UHG and she should not be demonized for her compensation. If you look at the Minnesota 2020 website, www.mn2020.org you may notice that of the four specific issues Matt has been writing about on the website, health care was one of the first. It is clear that he is spending time finding out what Minnesotans want by asking them and researching the best ways to deliver those solutions. That's the kind of leader I want. Who is with me?  

[ Parent ]
Why not? (0.00 / 0)
Lois Quam was paid tens of millions of dollars by a company that engaged in widespread fraud.  Her compensation certaly is an issue, especially if it is going to be funding her husband's campaign.  

[ Parent ]
Um, sorry but NO F-ING WAY... (4.00 / 1)
...not with health care being such an important issue. I don't want Mr. Quam anywhere near any levers of power. There are literally a boatload of other candidates that would do a better job of reflecting the wishes of the rank and filers of the DFL.

"...if my thought-dreams could be seen, they'd probably put my head in a guillotine..."----Bob Dylan, 1965.

Quick question (0.00 / 0)
Full disclosure, I'm completely on the fence/sidelines right now when it comes to the Gubernatorial DFL endorsement.

I just have a quick question ProudtobeaDem, what exactly are you implying with this statement?

Yes, John got beat in 1994. Then again, Matt ran for statewide seat in 2006 and didn't win.

Isn't there a difference between losing an election and not having your name on the ballot?


Good point, there is a big difference (in many ways!) (4.00 / 1)
Jacob, you raise a good point. Yes, there is a huge difference. John Marty ran an ethical campaign and made it all the way to a general election without having to bow out in disgrace.

No matter how much money is spent trying to spin that Entenza withdrew from the AG race out of "party unity", the facts speak for themselves. And besides, the research story wouldn't have been that big of a deal if he hadn't been dishonest by trying to deny it at first-that's what made it a bigger story. Plus, people already had concerns with his wife's position at UnitedHealth Group-and how it could lead to a conflict of interest. Entenza probably wasn't going to win anyway.  

However, my point was that just because somebody has run before without success doesn't mean they can't win in the future. That goes for many candidates in the race- Marty, Entenza, Kelly, etc. They all seem like they could be good candidates for Governor. Many great leaders have lost many times, before winning a higher office. Obama got beat soundly when he ran for congress. Yet, that turned out ok for him, and for all of us!  

I'm sticking with John Marty for Governor. He's right on the issues-especially health care. No other candidate has the courage and integrity that John Marty has. We can't keep offering band-aid solutions, we need real leadership. Marty is the only Democrat that seems to be offering that, and he always has. He's the guy we need and we can get it right this time. 3rd times a charm! Let's take the big money and lack of ethics out of politics-then maybe it will start working for the people, for a change! I'd encourage you to do more research about Senator Marty (but if you get caught doing research on him, just admit it right away ha.) I think you'll agree that he's the type of leader we need now.  


[ Parent ]
It'll be hard to choose (0.00 / 0)

In the end, it'll be hard to choose since there's good things about every dem candidate.  :=)  What about that...

[ Parent ]

Event Calendar
September 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 * *
<< (add event) >>


Liberal Blog Network
Agonist
All Spin Zone
AlterNet
AMERICAblog
American Street
ArchPundit
BAGNewsnotes
BartCop
Blogging of the Pres
BlogACTIVE
Bluegrass Report
Bluegrass Roots
Blue Indiana
BlueJersey
Blue Mass. Group
BlueOregon
BlueNC
Bob Geiger
Booman
Brendan Calling
BRAD Blog
Buckeye State Blog
Burnt Orange Report
Capitol Annex
Carpetbagger Report
Chris Floyd
Clay Cane
Calitics
Cliff Schecter
Confined Space
Corrente
Crooks and Liars
culture kitchen
Cursor
Daily Kos
David Corn
Dem Bloggers
Democrats.com
Deride and Conquer
Democratic Underground
Digby
DovBear
Drudge Retort
Ed Cone
ePluribus Media
Eschaton
Ezra Klein
Feministe
Feministing
Firedoglake
Fired Up
First Draft
Frameshop
Green Mountain Daily
Greg Palast
Hoffmania
Horse's Ass
Hughes for America
In Search of Utopia
Is That Legal?
Jesus' General
Jon Swift
Juan Cole
Keystone Politics
Kick! Making Politics Fun
KnoxViews
Lawyers, Guns & Money
Left Coaster
Left in the West
Liberal Avenger
Liberal Oasis
Loaded Orygun
Mahablog
Majikthise
Make Them Accountable
Matthew Yglesias
MaxSpeak
Media Girl
Michigan Liberal
MN Campaign Report
Minnesota Monitor
MyDD
My Left Nutmeg
My Left Wing
My Two Sense
Nathan Newman
Needlenose
Nevada Today
News Dissector
Newshoggers
News Hounds
Nitpicker
Oliver Willis
onegoodmove
OpenLeft
PageOneQ
Pam's House Blend
Pandagon
People's Rep. of Seabrook
PinkDome
Politics1
Political Animal
Political Wire
Poor Man Institute
Prairie State Blue
Progressive Historians
Raw Story
Reno Discontent
Republic of T
Rhode Island's Future
Rochester Turning
Rocky Mountain Report
Rod 2.0
Rude Pundit
Sadly, No!
Saterical Political Report
Seeing The Forest
Shakesville
SirotaBlog
SistersTalk
Skippy
Slacktivist
Smirking Chimp
SquareState
Suburban Guerrilla
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo
Talk Left
Tapped
Taylor Marsh
Tattered Coat
Texas Kaos
The Albany Project
The Blue State
The Democratic Daily
The Hollywood Liberal
The Reaction
The Talent Show
This Modern World
Town Called Dobson
Wampum
War and Piece
WashBlog
Watching the Watchers
West Virginia Blue
Young Philly Politics
Young Turks





Premium Blog Ads

Hate ads? Make them go away -- Subscribe to MPP!

Change.org|Start Petition





MN-PLAN Ads

Blog Ads




Powered by: SoapBlox