| "Romney's opponents" refers to Gingrich, Santorum, and Paul, all of whom have fans in the Minnesota GOP base. (Gingrich has long been a hero for talk radio conservative audiences here, Santorum is lauded by the same state religious right that brought Michele Bachmann into Congress, and Paul has his own significant fan base inside the GOP activist community. All these constituencies have been dismissive of Romney as a desirable leader, up this year.)
The UPI article linked to below reports a couple of different poll results that show Gingrich doing surprisingly well against Mr. Moneybags, her in Minnesota.
"The Minnesota GOP caucuses tend to be dominated by strong conservatives, so it is quite possible that Gingrich or Santorum could upset Romney in Minnesota," said political commentator Steven Schier, political science professor at Carleton College in Minnesota.
"Minnesota is perhaps the best place for a candidate other than Romney to 'steal a win' because strong conservatives dominate the caucuses and Romney so far has shown less appeal among strongly conservative Republicans," Schier said.
Yeah, yeah, Professor Schier--but money is what counts in the GOP, and the national media seems intent on making Romney the nominee. Those are two pretty tough realities to beat. If Gingrich or Santorum hand Romney a slight humiliation in Minnesota (as they did in Iowa and South Carolina)--is that really going to overcome the money/professional news media steam roller behind Romney?
I like this story, even though I think UPI and the Hill are kind of stupid to go to Romney staffer Tim Pawlenty for a definitive take on the importance of conservative activists who secretly or openly despise both Mitt Romney and Tim Pawlenty.
I like the story because it reminds us that the activists who currently dominate the state's GOP 1) are well to the right of most of Minnesota's Republican voters and uncommitted voters and 2) are well to the right of too many of Minnesota's most successful elected Republicans.
I also like the story because it gives Tim Pawlenty a chance to publicly dismiss "what the state's most active conservative activists want"--as largely irrelevant. He never had a chance to humiliate them publicly, when he needed them to rise through state government and into the governor's mansion.
It's healthy for both Pawlenty and the state's conservatives when Pawlenty gets to say what he thinks of them and their agenda. "It doesn't matter what all those right wing yo-yos in my state, think," is his message here.
And in this case, Pawlenty's right. The yo-yo conservatives may make a stand for Gingrich or one of the others, but they're like to get Romney anyway--supporting another liberal Republican against Obama. Nobody in the leadership of their party really believes in or respects what they think. After all, these GOP activist saps spent all those years telling voters to back *Pawlenty," time after time after time...
LINK:
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US... |